Friday, 18 July 2025

Let's All Go To The Movies. Pt.8.

To be read as a continuation of Part 7; https://watchitdie.blogspot.com/2025/04/lets-all-go-to-movies-pt7.html

I'm Still Here (2024): Within the discussions surrounding The Oscars 2025 this is, primarily, another movie about the challenges women face in the Entertainment Industry as they age. The title being a response to the way that women used to disappear from the Entertainment Industry the moment they hit 50. 

It tells the story of Eunice Paiva at three stages in her life; Aged around 40 in 1970, aged around 67 in 1996 and aged around 85 in 2014. In 1970 the 40 year old Eunice Paiva is played by Fernanda Torres, an actress nearly 20 years older than the character at the time. The 59 year old Fernanda Torres also plays Eunice Paiva in 1996 when the actress is nearly 20 years younger than the character. Aged 86 Eunice Paiva is played by Fernanda Montenegro who was born in the same year as the character but now a decade later is playing a character 10 years younger than her. Fernanda Montenegro is Fernanda Torres' Mother. Unlike in The Brutalist (2024) I'm Still Here drew the line at having an actress playing a role old enough to be her own Mother. Instead using her actual Mother.

The movie looks at Eunice Paiva's life at key points following the disappearance of her husband, Rubens Paiva at the hands of the Military Dictatorship which ruled Brazil during the time of The Fifth Brazilian Republic (1964-1985). I've found that in order to understand the Military Dictatorship of The Fifth Brazilian Republic you have to understand Brazil's political history from the time that it was a Portuguese Colony.

Brazil has always had a very rich and diverse population of Aboriginal or Indigenous tribes whose roots have been traced back over 11,000 years. Within Brazil's interior there are still hidden tribes who are only now making contact with the outside world for the first time. However the first Portuguese to discover Brazil was Pedro Álvares Cabral in April 1500. It was the Portuguese who gave Brazil its modern name after finding to be abundant with a species of tree that could be used to make a reddish dye; "Pau-brasilia (Brazilwood)." From the Latin; "Pau" meaning; "Wood" and; "Brasil" meaning "Ember-like glow." A detail that is probably worth remembering at an Awards Season overshadowed by the Wildfires which devastated parts of Los Angeles, such as the Pacific Palisades neighbourhood, at the start of January 2025.

Initially The Portuguese Empire (1415-1999) had little interest in Colonising Brazil. While it had an abundance of interesting trees you could make dye from The Portuguese Empire saw Brazil's main importance as nothing more than a trade route from Asia. However they realised that they needed to establish some sort of presence there in order to keep the trade route open. 

The Portuguese Empire set about establishing that presence by turning to what using modern terminology would be considered the Private Sector. In 1534 it established 15 land parcels, The Captaincies of Brazil, essentially by drawing horizontal lines across Brazil. Private individuals were then able to bid for these land parcels. The winning bidders became the; "Donatário" (Endowed One) or; "Captain" of that parcel of land and were allowed to run it, more or less, as they wished. It was actually The Portuguese Empire which pioneered the use of Slave Labour on Sugar Plantations. Its influence in The Americas diminished as other European Colonial Powers, particularly Britain and The Netherlands, started bringing large numbers of African Slaves to Sugar Plantations in the Caribbean via The Atlantic Slave Trade, rather than using Slaves captured locally.

So you could certainly describe The Captaincies of Brazil as extreme, idealised versions of; "Totalitarian Capitalism" even if they were established slightly before Capitalism as we know it came into being. They could also be likened to the Feudal System in place in Europe in The Middle Ages (5th Century A.D to 15th Century A.D) where the land was owned by the Nobility and the Peasants worked it for the benefit of the landowners. Although in the European Feudal system the land was owned by the Monarch and control of it was divided up between their relatives while The Captaincies of Brazil were donated to private bidders, supposedly on the basis of merit.

Alongside The Oscars the other big event of America's Awards Season is The Super Bowl and its Half-Time Show. This year the Half-Time Show was performed by Kendrick Lamar and SZA. It took a detailed look at the Urban Geography of Los Angeles. How when the US took control of Los Angeles from Mexico at the end of The Mexican-American War (1846-1848) it did so as much with Engineers, Map-Makers and Urban Planners than it did with Infantry and Cavalry. It mapped the area for the first time, dividing it up into land parcels. Many of these land parcels were given away by California Governor and later Senator Leland Stanford. Either to himself or his friends Collis Potter Huntington, Mark Hopkins Jr and Charles Crocker. This was a common practice across America at the time with California's; "Big Four" being just some of the; "Robber Barons" who dominated during America's; "Gilded Age." The era of America's Robber Barons came to an end with The Teapot Dome Scandal (1923-1929). The way that The Captaincies of Brazil were established and run is very similar to the way the Robber Barons of America's Gilded Age operated.

For a variety of reasons the Captaincies of Brazil were not particularly successful. In 1548 the Captaincy of Bahia (Baía de Todos os Santos) was overrun by an indigenous tribe of cannibals who ate the Captain, Francisco Pereira Coutinho, and his settlers. This forced the Portuguese Empire to deploy its troops to Bahia, placing it under the control of a Royal Governor. Bringing the Captaincy of Bahia into what we would now consider the Public Sector and turning it into an example of State-run Totalitarian Capitalism. Eventually this model was extended to all of the Captaincies of Brazil turning them into what would now be considered Federal States. However the culture continued with each State being considered the private fiefdom of its Strongman Captain or; “Gaucho.” Even the Portuguese term; Donatário or; “Endowed One” is dripping with the Machismo toxic masculinity that women still face in the Entertainment Industry.

Brazil’s journey from European Colony to independent nation was also an unusual one. I think that we all know by now that the European Settlers in North America fought a war against their Colonial masters to become an independent nation; The American Revolutionary War (1775-1783). European Settlers in Mexico also fought a war against their Colonial masters to become an independent nation; The Mexican War of Independence (1810-1821). While the majority of European Colonies were granted independence after their Colonial masters had bankrupted themselves during The First World War (1914-1918) and The Second World War (1939-1945) and were no longer able to afford Colonies.

In 1808 the Napoleonic Empire of France invaded Portugal, The Peninsular War (1808-1814). This saw the Portuguese King and Royal Court travel to Brazil and establish Brazil as part of the Kingdom of Portugal, rather than a mere Colony of The Portuguese Empire. By all accounts the King, John VI, would have been happy to remain in Brazil and rule his entire kingdom from there for the rest of his life. However by 1821, 12 years after the end of the Peninsula War, the people of Portugal were restless at their King’s absence and demanded his return. King John VI left his son, Pedro, as Prince Regent of Brazil.

The following year Pedro announced Brazil’s succession from the Kingdom of Portugal. Establishing himself as Emperor Pedro I and Brazil as a Constitutional Monarchy. A system of government similar to modern day Britain’s. Where there is a Monarch as Head of State but the running of the country is left to the government. In 1826 King John VI died and Emperor Pedro I’s brother, Miguel I, claimed the Portuguese throne. Intent on maintaining Portugal as an Absolute Monarchy, where the Monarch runs absolutely everything. In 1831 Emperor Pedro I abdicated the Brazilian throne in order to return to Portugal and support his daughter, Maria II, to take back the Portuguese throne and establish Portugal as a Constitutional Monarchy.

Emperor Pedro I abdicated in favour of his son, Emperor Pedro II, who was only 5 years old at the time. When Emperor Pedro II came of age in 1840, at 14 years old, he set about turning Brazil into a Parliamentary Monarchy. In which he was Head of State but the running of the country was left to a government made up of a Parliament, as opposed to a confederacy of Captains or Donatário. 

In 1850 Emperor Pedro II’s only son died leaving only his daughters as potential heirs. There was a widespread feeling throughout the country that Brazil’s very macho, misogynistic gaucho cultural would not tolerate a female Monarch. Rather like how some would say that the American Entertainment Industry still won’t tolerate women in positions of power. Like his father Emperor Pedro II never seemed that keen on being Monarch or the idea of a Monarchy, both working throughout their lives to reduce the power of the Monarchy. With the death of his son Emperor Pedro II seemed to give up on the idea of Brazil continuing as any form of Monarchy. The next 40 years were really spent waiting for the current Monarch to die so Brazil could become a Republic. Including by the Monarch himself.

It was really The Portuguese Empire which pioneered the business model of using Slave Labour on Sugar Plantations which came to dominate the Americas during the European Colonial Era. Part of the price that Emperor Pedro I had to pay for British support for Brazil’s succession from the Kingdom of Portugal, alongside trade concessions, was an end to its participation in The Atlantic Slave Trade in 1825. In 1888 Emperor Pedro II went one step further, ending slavery in Brazil entirely. That outraged the Captains or Donatário who were not compensated for what they saw as their property being seized by the Monarch. That added to the outrage that they felt over Emperor Pedro II reducing their power by introducing a Parliamentary system of government. Conversely reformists were outraged that Emperor Pedro II had taken too long to abolish slavery and wasn’t going far enough in reducing the power of the Captains or Donatário.

By 1889 almost all sections of Brazilian society had got fed up with waiting for Emperor Pedro II to die, so Brazil could become a Republic. On November 15th a group of Brazilian military officers led by Deodoro da Fonseca took matters into their own hands. Staging a Coup d'état; The Coup of 1889 or The Coup of the Republic. Enjoying widespread support, even from the Emperor himself The Coup of 1889 was short and bloodless. Deodoro da Fonseca paraded troops through the then capital Rio de Janeiro, deposed the Monarch and its government and proclaimed Brazil to be a Republic. Emperor Pedro II died two years later in exile in France.

The Coup of 1889 established The First Brazilian Republic (1889-1930). It also established the Brazilian Military, particularly the Army, not as servants of the government and people of Brazil but as an integral part of the government of Brazil. What people familiar with nations such as modern Egypt would recognise as a; “Deep State.” 

At around 15:30 on 18/7/25 (UK date) there's still a long list of facts and dates to come.

Edited at around 16:55 on 21/7/25 (UK date) to copy & paste;

The initial plan for The Coup of 1889 is that there would be a five year transition period. During which Deodoro da Fonseca would rule with absolute power by Executive Order or Diktat while a new system of government was devised. Due to both domestic and international pressure this; "Republic of the Sword" came to an end after just two years with a new Constitution being adopted in 1891. 

In establishing the First Republic Brazil very much tried to emulate the United States. Adopting a system of government where States were given autonomy over their own affairs united under a Federal government. That Federal government was a Constitutional Republic with three branches; Executive, Legislative and Judicial. Essentially a President, a Congress and Courts. The First Brazilian Republic even adopted the Stars & Stripes as its flag. Only with a Green, Gold and Blue colour scheme rather than Red, White and Blue.

Due to the rush Brazil didn't do a particularly good job of establishing itself as a Federation of States within a Constitutional Republic. Unless it was specifically mentioned in the Constitution then all powers remained with the States rather than the weak Federal government. At the time it was common for Europeans to refer to; "The Brazils" rather than; "Brazil." Viewing the States as separate countries all doing their own thing at their own pace rather than parts of a single country. As a result the Captaincy or Donatário system continued, only now known as; "Coronelismo." 

The First Brazilian Republic was only ever nominal in its Democracy with voting being limited to only the literate at a time when only 5% of the population was literate. Although there was no law saying that women couldn't vote there was also no law saying that women could vote. So, in practice, women didn't vote. Voting was also not secret meaning that the people who could vote voted for the candidate their local Captain, Donatário or Colonel told them to vote for. If people voted against the way they were told to vote then the results of the vote were simply changed by either the Donatário or the Federal government.

During this time the two wealthiest States or Captaincies in Brazil were São Paolo, which was a centre for Coffee production, and Minas Gerias, which was a centre for Cattle and Dairy farming. So throughout the First Brazilian Republic it was the Donatário of São Paolo and Minas Gerias who chose the government of Brazil, alternating the Presidency between them. An arrangement which was known as; "Café com Leite" or; "Coffee with Milk."

During The First Brazilian Republic the economy remained almost exclusively agricultural, based around Cash Cropping. The Donatário would use their fiefdoms to grow crops like Coffee, Sugar and Rubber which were then sold to the Industrialised World - the European Colonial Powers along with America. Some of the proceeds were used to import small amounts of things like machinery from the Industrialised World. 

This changed with the outbreak of The First World War (1914-1918). Initially Brazil tried to remain neutral, continuing to export its Cash Crops to both the Entente Powers; France, Britain, America, Russia etc and the Central Powers; Germany, the Ottoman Empire etc. However with both sides trying to blockade each other Brazil was forced to trade much more with the near-by America. When America joined the Entente Powers Brazil also joined the Entente Powers, earning itself a place at the Paris Peace Conference (1919-1920) which resulted in the Treaty of Versailles (1919). Brazil was also forced to shift its economy away from Cash Crop based exports and towards domestic production and consumption. As a result the Industrial Revolution of the 19th Century finally arrived in Brazil in the 1920's. Bringing with it the population shift from the country to the city and the conflict between Capital and Labour.

Through the Super Bowl Half-Time Show and The Brutalist (2024) success at The Oscars this year's Awards Season has looked extensively at "Metropolis" (1927). Arguably the most influential movie ever made. Metropolis was made during The Weimar Republic (1918-1933), the Germany which existed between the Paris Peace Conference and Treaty of Versailles and the rise of Nazi Germany, leading to The Second World War (1939-1945). It is all about Urbanisation and the conflict between Capital and Labour which emerged during the Industrial Revolution of the 19th Century. It was intended as a Communist warning about Fascism fuelled by rising public anger.

During The First World War and the subsequent Interwar period a lot of people decided to get the hell out of Europe. Fleeing to America and The Americas, including Brazil. So this global polarisation between the radical politics of Communism and Fascism most certainly affected Brazil, particularly the Brazilian Military. The Coup of 1889 established the Brazilian Military as a sort of Deep State, an integral part of the Brazilian government rather than servants of the Brazilian government and the Brazilian people. The polarisation between Fascism and Communism lead to a split within the Brazilian military. The officer class supported Fascism while the enlisted ranks, sergeants and below supported Communism. 

Industrialisation weakened the Donatário significantly. Ahead of the 1930 Election the Coffee with Milk coalition broke down. The incumbent President Washington Luís from São Paolo announced that his successor would be Júlio Prestes, also from São Paolo. Seeing itself as being robbed of its turn Minas Gerias threw its support behind the Liberal Alliance coalition led by Getúlio Vargas

Júlio Prestes was declared the winner of the 1930 Election while the Liberal Alliance refused to accept the result. In July 1930 Vargas' running mate, João Pessoa was killed. The Liberal Alliance used the killing as justification to launch a revolution; The Revolution of 1930, to depose Prestes' government and replace it with Vargas. With battles breaking out across Brazil the Brazilian Military intervened to prevent a Civil War. Mounting a Coup d'état to depose Prestes' government and placing Brazil under the rule of a Military Junta; The Pacification Junta. Bringing an end to The First Brazilian Republic. After 10 days The Pacification Junta installed Getúlio Vargas as Head of the Provisional Government and establishing The Second Brazilian Republic (1930-1937).

As Head of the Provisional Government Getúlio Vargas followed Deodoro da Fonseca in ruling by Executive Order of Diktat. One of the first Executive Orders he issued was Decree No. 19.398. This dissolved Brazil's Congress and all of its State Legislatures and Municipal Councils, giving Vargas the power to appoint officials at all levels by Executive Order. It suspended the 1891 Constitution, expect for Habeas Corpus for common crimes and placed Vargas and all members of the Provisional Government above the law and review by the Courts. Essentially suspending the Judicial Branch of the government alongside the Legislative Branch.

By giving himself all power Getúlio Vargas stripped the Donatário of any power. In 1932 the Donatário of Minas Gerias and Rio Grande do Sul, which has backed the Liberal Alliance, along with Paraíba joined forces with São Paolo to launch The Constitutionalist Revolution (1932). First to force Vargas and the Provisional Government to adopt a new Constitution and return to civilian rule or, failing that, overthrow Vargas and the Provisional Government. The Constitutionalist Revolution was defeated in a little under three months.

A new Constitution was adopted in 1934 and Brazil returned to civilian rule with Getúlio Vargas being elected President with a single term ending in 1938. However one of the first acts of Vargas' civilian government was to introduce the so-called; "National Security Law" (Law No.38) which allowed it to suppress opposition under the guise of protecting political and social order. In 1935 the launched the government news/propaganda radio program; "Horo do Brasil (Hour of Brazil)" which later became; "Voz do Brasil (Voice of Brazil)" which continues to be broadcast to this day.  

Throughout The Second Brazilian Republic the polarisation between Fascism and Communism which gripped much of the World also affected Brazil. In 1932 Plínio Salgado formed Brazilian Integralist Action (Ação Integralista Brasileira/AIB). Sometimes known as; "Greenshirts" the AIB was Fascist paramilitary organisation in the mould of Benito Mussolini's "Blackshirts" in Italy and Adolf Hitler's "Brownshirts" in Germany. They're said to be particularly similar to Eoin O'Duffy's "Blueshirts" in Ireland. While the Brazilian Communist Party (Partido Comunista Brasileiro/PCB), founded in 1922, grew in strength. In 1935 sergeants of the Brazilian Military who were members of  the Brazilian Communist Party, backed by the Soviet Union, staged a short, four day, uprising in Brazil's North-East (Natal, Recife) with some limited support in the capital, Rio de Janeiro. The 1935 Communist Uprising.

At around 17:25 I'll try and finish this list of facts & dates then start analysing it tomorrow.

Edited at around 18:30 on 22/7/25 (UK date) to tidy all of the above and copy & paste;

In response to the 1935 Communist Uprising the Communist Party of Brazil was banned. Getúlio Vargas introduced the National Commission for the Repression of Communism and the National Security Tribunal to suppress opposition under the guise of fighting Communism outside of the normal police and Courts system. In March 1936 Congress was raided and five members of the National Liberation Alliance were arrested. 

In December 1935 a 90 day State of Emergency was introduced and renewed five times, suspending the 1934 Constitution. Under Justice Minister Francisco Campos the government of Getúlio Vargas set about drafting a new Constitution. "A Real Pain" (2024) looked at the history of Poland, both as part of Nazi Germany during The Second World War and The Second Polish Republic (1918-1939) that preceded it. The Second Polish Republic being the first Fascist Dictatorship in Europe, before Italy and German. Getúlio Vargas was particularly inspired by Poland's Fascist Dictatorship, to the point that the Constitution it eventually introduced in 1937 often referred to as; "Polaca" or; "The Polish One."

Prior to the 1935 Communist Uprising the Officer class of the Brazilian Military had increasingly embraced Fascism. In the wake of the 1935 Communist Uprising they saw their role within Brazilian politics as defending the nation against Communism and Fascism as the best defence against Communism. Amid a wave of anti-Communist sentiment Getúlio Vargas saw a way to stay in power beyond 1938 and Brazilian Integralist Action saw a way to seize power for the first time. 

In 1938 the head of Brazilian Integralist Action, Plínio Salgado, instructed his Chief-of-Staff, Olímpio Mourão Filho to devise what became known as; "The Cohen Plan." Borrowing heavily from; "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion" (1903) and steeped in the Anti-Semitism of European Fascism this portrayed Communism as a Jewish conspiracy to enslave non-Jews. It then detailed an elaborate plan for this Jewish-Communist conspiracy to seize power in Brazil, rather like the 1935 Communist Uprising. Taking the form of a letter being written by a foreign Jew to Brazilian Communists Mourão signed the plan as; "Béla Kun," a Hungarian Jewish Communist who led the 1919 revolution which established The Hungarian Soviet Republic (1919-1919). This was then changed to the fictional; "Béla Cohen" as; "Cohen" was seen as a more obviously Jewish name.

Olímpio Mourão Filho believed he was being tasked with writing a discussion document. A sort of war-game imagining a scenario so people could discuss and imagine how to respond to the scenario. This is something he detailed in the first chapter of the plan. However the second chapter and only the second chapter was then fraudulently presented as a genuine piece of intelligence, a communication between a foreign Jew and his Brazilian Communist co-conspirators. Being presented as evidence of a real plot this 'letter from Béla Cohen' was widely circulated amongst the Brazilian Military, the Brazilian political class and the general public. In re-printing it the typesetter made a mistake and changed; "Béla Cohen" to simply; "Cohen."

Getúlio Vargas used the Cohen Plan to convince Brazil's Congress to go beyond a State of Emergency and declare a State of War on October 1st 1937 (1/10/1937). This cancelled the scheduled 1938 Election and gave Vargas absolute power over all of Brazil's Military and Police Forces. Due to the Donátario culture Brazil's State Police Forces have always been heavily militarized. It was only an agreement from The First Brazilian Republic which prevented them from having heavy artillery. On November 10th (10/11/1937) Getúlio Vargas used that absolute power over the police and military to overthrow the Brazilian Congress in a coup d'état. The 1937 Brazilian Coup d'état.

The 1937 Brazilian Coup d'état brought an end to The Second Brazilian Republic and ushered in the start of The Third Brazilian Republic (1937-1945). A Fascist Dictatorship Getúlio Vargas named The Third Brazilian Republic the; "Estado Novo (New State)." Copying the Fascist Dictatorship which had been established in Portugal in 1926. People talk about the end of The Second World War bringing about the defeat of Fascism in Europe. Yet rather like how they find it convenient to forget that Poland was the first Fascist Dictatorship in Europe they also seem to find it convenient to forget that Spain remained as a Fascist Dictatorship until 1975. While Portugal was a Fascist Dictatorship until 1974, when Marcelo Caetano was deposed with a little bit of help from ABBA and the Eurovision Song Contest.

Inspired by and modelled on European Fascist Dictatorships Brazil's Estado Novo would have been a natural ally from the Axis Powers of Germany and Italy during The Second World War. However Getúlio Vargas was driven only by his desire for power rather than any wider ideology. His alignment with Brazilian Integralist Action was merely a marriage of convenience. Following a failed Brazilian Integralist Action coup attempt against him in 1938 Vargas probably felt that a closer alliance with European Fascists would bring an end to his regime. The Second Polish Republic certainly wasn't opposed to accepting German Nazism, merely having to accept a German leader. Also Estado Novo came into being due to Vargas' fear that he lacked popular support ahead of the cancelled 1938 Election. There were certainly plenty of Brazilians who were more sympathetic to Europe's non-Fascists and Soviet Russia than they were to Vargas and Brazilian Integralist Action.

On December 7th 1941 (7/12/1941) Japan attacked America at the Pearl Harbour naval base. This saw Japan join The Second World War on the side of the Axis Powers and forced America to join The Second World War on the side of the Allied Powers. Japan's rapidly expanding control of South-East Asia saw the Allied Powers cut off from their vital supplies of Rubber. Making them almost wholly dependent on Brazilian Rubber. If Brazil had also joined the Axis Powers then America would have invaded Brazil under; "Plan Rubber." This threat of American invasion along with a huge bribe to build a massive Steel plant saw Brazil's Estado Novo join the Allied Powers in January 1943. The Brazilian Expeditionary Force (BEF) went on to serve in Italy from 1944 until 1945.

With Brazil having fought Fascism during The Second World War Fascism very much fell out of favour within Brazil following the end of The Second World War on August 15th 1945 (15/8/1945). Many of those who had served as part of the BEF had been conscripted as punishment for political opposition to the Vargas regime. The wider Brazilian Military certainly didn't see heroically serving in the Brazilian Military as a punishment for being anti-Brazilian. So the Brazilian Military deposed Getúlio Vargas in a popular Coup d'état on October 29th 1945 (29/10/1945) bringing an end to The Third Brazilian Republic. At the earliest opportunity an election was held on December 2nd 1945 (2/12/1945) which saw Eurico Gaspar Dutra elected President and the establishment of The Fourth Brazilian Republic (1945-1964).

At around 19:10 on 22/7/25 (UK date) I'm not quite sure when I'll be able to extend this long list of facts and dates. 

Edited at around 16:50 on 28/7/25 (UK date) to copy & paste;

As President Dutra brought Brazil much closer to the US. Breaking off diplomatic ties with the Soviet Union and helping the US bring 20+ nations of The Americas together under the Inter-American Treaty of Reciprocal Assistance (1948). On paper this so-called; "Rio Pact" is similar to NATO, seeing members guarantee each other's security by viewing an attack on one as an attack on all. In practice though it is just a formalisation of The Monroe Doctrine (1823) - The US views Latin America as its property. The US will view any interference in Latin America as an act of war against the US. In support of the Rio Pact President Dutra established the Superior School of War (ESG) within the Brazilian Military which would come to be very important in subsequent years.

At the time the US was obsessed with Infrastructure Development as a driver for Economic Growth. President Franklin D. Roosevelt's "New Deal" was seen to have lifted the US out of The Great Depression (1929-1945) and into The Second World War. The Second World War gave way to the Marshall Plan or; "Foreign Assistance Act of 1948" to rebuild Europe's war ravaged infrastructure. President Dutra was particularly taken with the US' obsession with the car as king which led the Federal Highways Act of 1956 and saw Los Angeles develop as a patchwork of neighbourhoods linked by Freeways. So Dutra opened Brazil's markets to the US' Big Three Auto companies and built over 500km (300 miles) of Freeways during his five years in office. Including the BR-116 Freeway which he named after himself, Rodovia Presidente Dutra.

At the 1950 Election Getúlio Vargas, the dictator deposed in the 1945 Coup d'état, returned to power as elected President. Vargas' second term was really dominated by trying to convince everyone that he was no longer a dictator and would give up power when his term ended. However he inherited a lot of economic problems from Eurico Gaspar Dutra who had funded much of Infrastructure Development through foreign debt. In response President Vargas undertook a large program of Nationalisation. Taking businesses which had previously been in the Private Sector into the Public Sector. For example he created the Brazilian State Oil Corporation Petrobras in 1953 and the National Bank for Economic and Social Development (BNDES).

On August 5th 1954 (5/8/1954) two members of Getúlio Vargas's personal security team shot and killed Brazilian Air Force Major Rubens Florentino Vaz and wounded anti-Vargas journalist Carlos Lacerda. It is not clear if Vargas authorised the assassination attempt, it's reported that upon hearing about it he said; "Carlos Lacerda was shot in the foot. I was shot twice in the back." However it certainly didn't help convince people that Vargas wasn't a dictator who would give up power when his term ended in 1956. Amid calls for his resignation Vargas declared that he would only leave the Presidential Palace dead. Fearing that the Brazilian Military would again overthrow him on August 24th 1954 (24/8/1954) Vargas committed suicide in the Presidential Palace.

Following Vargas' death Vice President Café Filho took over as President until he suffered a Stroke and had to resign on November 8th 1955 (8/11/1955). Filho was replaced by Speaker of the Lower House of Congress Carlos Luz. Brazil's 1955 Election had been held in October and at the time of Carlos Luz taking over the Presidency the results were hotly contested. Amid fears that he would overturn the Election results and establish another dictatorship the Brazilian Military removed Carlos Luz as President on November 11th 1955 (11/11/1955). The Preventative Coup of November 11th. Vice President of the Upper House of Congress Nereu Ramos became interim President until the new President was inaugurated in January 1956.

The new President Juscelino Kubitschek had been elected on a mandate of; "Fifty Years of Progress in Five!" Upon taking office he laid out his; "Plano de Metas" establishing 30 development goals across 6 areas such as Energy and Transportation. As with President Dutra President Kubitschek saw the US model of Infrastructure Development as key to Economic Development with the car as king. It was President Kubitschek who ordered the building of Brasília, Brazil's new and current capital. Built in the Modernist style of Oscar Niemeyer Brasília was planned in the Brutalist style by Lúcio Costa. Its key feature is two Freeways intersecting in the shape of a cross.

The US model of Infrastructure Development as key for Economic Development is built around the Public Sector. Both the New Deal and the Marshall Plan were paid for using public money and largely carried out as public works, using State Owned Enterprises (SOE's) similar to Petrobras. Again as with President Dutra President Kubitschek instead made the Private Sector central to his program of Infrastructure Development. Ironically one of the main reasons Carlos Luz gave for trying to stop Kubitschek from becoming President was that he was secretly a Communist. An economic system which excludes the Private Sector entirely.

Alongside foreign loans President Kubitschek massively loosened the rules of foreign investment, offering land grants, tax breaks and profit remittances for foreign companies willing to invest. However these incentives were dependent on the foreign investors finding Brazilian partners (associated capital). As the predominately American foreign Multinationals were much larger than their Brazilian counterparts they simply absorbed the Brazilian companies. Reversing the industrialisation Brazil underwent in the 1920's. 

So while Brazil's industrial sector grew by some 80% and its GDP by 7% during this period very little of that money stayed in Brazil. Instead being taken out as profits of the predominately American foreign Multinationals (profit remittances). With the Multinationals treating Brazil as a workshop to make things for them to sell in other countries, a sort of industrial cash-cropping, Brazil's domestic market was forced to rely heavily on imports the cost of which massively drove inflation, while wages were stagnating. The result of all this US investment in Brazil was Brazil being forced to accept an absolutely massive US$300m from the US.

President Kubitschek reached his term limit in 1961 and peacefully transferred power to his elected replacement, Jânio Quadros. The first time in Brazil's history that a President peacefully transferred power to an opponent

Jânio Quadros had been elected by a landslide to undo the economic damage done by Juscelino Kubitschek. In part he set about doing this by distancing Brazil from the US. He re-established diplomatic ties with the Soviet Union in order to achieve a Neutralist position. Making Brazil an ally of neither the US nor the Soviet Union but, at the same time, an ally to both. However while President Quadros had been elected in a landslide he did not have control of either Houses of Congress meaning that his Presidency stalled amid political deadlock. At the peak of this deadlock, on August 25th 1961 (25/8/1961) Jânio Quadros sensationally resigned. To this day no-one is exactly sure why Jânio Quadros resigned. However there is a large body of opinion that it was a strategic move, part of a cunning plan which failed.

Going all the way back to the Captaincies and Donatário of the Colonial Era Brazilian politics has been dominated by its own form of Popularism, Brazilian Popularism. Policy and Ideology don't matter, all that matters is the personality of the leader and the relationship they have with the masses, typically the poor and disenfranchised. The leader convinces the masses that they're in a sort of conspiratorial relationship with each other, battling the people who are trying to oppress them. That can be the Capitalists, the Communists, the Colonialists, the Deep State, the Military, the Establishment. The slogan and the shared enemy can easily be changed as suits the dear leader. Having been elected in a landslide Quadros was probably thinking that the masses wouldn't stand for their dear leader being forced to resign by the oppressors in Congress.

The Second World War gave way to The Cold War (1945-1990). This saw the Capitalist First World pitted against the Communist Second World. The battle ground was the Third World. Nations which weren't economically developed enough to have any real political system and nations that were only arriving at the Industrialisation that was taking place in Europe around the time of the 1917 Russian Revolution

When the Cold War began the Capitalist First World was dominant. The Communist Second World was really only made up of Soviet Russia. Then the Capitalist First World took two big, early, losses. First in 1949 when China became part of the Communist Second World. Alongside Soviet Russia this gave the Communist Second World control over all of North-East Asia. The second came in 1959 when Cuba joined the Communist Second World following the revolution led by Fidel Castro and Che Guevara. This brought the Communist Second World into The Americas, which the US, as leaders of the Capitalist First World, saw as its property. In 1961, under Democrat President John F. Kennedy the US unsuccessfully invaded Cuba in an attempt to return it to the Capitalist First World. The Bay of Pigs Invasion.

So weak was President Quadros' position that even his Vice-President, João Goulart, was from an opposition party. Only July 28th (28/7/1961), around a month before his resignation, Quadros dispatched João Goulart on a trade mission to newly Communist China. Probably the most terrifying place that supporters of the Capitalist First World could imagine at the time. To give you an idea of how long international travel took back then João Goulart didn't actually arrive in China until August 18th (18/8/1961), a week before Quadros resigned.

Knowing how long it would take for Goulart to return from China to replace him Quadros seems to have been thinking that Congress would hesitate in accepting his resignation. Even if they only hesitated for a couple of days over a weekend that would bring his supporters, the masses, out in protest against the dear leader being forced to resign by the Establishment. At the same time the Brazilian Military would be so worried about João Goulart's links to Communism that they would not stand for him becoming President. So Quadros' resignation would not be accepted and he would be able to stay on as President enjoying greater power amid the weakened power of Congress, breaking the political deadlock.

Like Getúlio Vargas before him Jânio Quadros quickly discovered that either Brazilian Popularism wasn't as strong as it used to be or he didn't enjoy as close a relationship with the masses as he thought. They largely did not come out in protest against his resignation. Any attempts at a popular mobilisation certainly weren't helped by Congress not hesitating to accept Quadros' resignation, accepting it in two hours. Seeming to give Jânio Quadros the dubious honour of being a President who resigned by accident.

At around 17:10 on 28/7/25 (UK date) I'll try to continue the long journey to Brazil's 1964 Coup on Wednesday.


Monday, 28 April 2025

Let's All Go To The Movies. Pt.7.

Best read as a continuation of; https://watchitdie.blogspot.com/2025/04/lets-all-go-to-movies-pt6.html

The Substance (2024): This tells the story of Elisabeth Sparkles, played by Demi Moore. Once a popular Hollywood actress as she's aged Elisabeth Sparkles has been reduced to being an Aerobics instructor on Daytime TV. When she reaches her 50th birthday Elisabeth Sparkles is fired from even her Daytime TV show. She is then introduced to a mysterious blackmarket drug known only as; "The Substance." 

After injecting herself with the drug Elisabeth Sparkles, essentially, gives birth to a younger version of herself known as; "Sue" and played by Margaret Qualley. Sue then goes on to replace Elisabeth Sparkles on the Daytime TV show, essentially getting Elisabeth Sparkles her job back. However Elisabeth Sparkles and Sue cannot exist in the World at the same time. They need to alternate every seven days with one body remaining unconscious for that week. Elisabeth Sparkles much prefers her younger, popular, Sue body so she stops alternating every seven days. After three months this causes both bodies to deteriorate.

The Substance is a movie that explores women aging in the Entertainment Industry. How their careers were seen to be coming to an end by the time they turn 40 years old and are certainly over by the time they're 50. The mysterious blackmarket drug serves as a metaphor for all of the anti-aging cosmetic treatments that women in the Entertainment Industry will try to keep themselves looking young and in work. Botox, Collagen, Hyaluronic Acid, Peptides, Salmon sperm facials. The list seems to be endless and ever growing with a hot new fad seeming to emerge every day. 

Although strictly speaking a weight-loss rather than an anti-aging treatment the injectable nature of the mysterious substance seems to particularly reference the current fashion for Semaglutide (Ozempic). Weight being another example of how women in the Entertainment Industry are judged on their looks. Back in the 1970's and 1980's, prior to the invention of weight-loss drugs, women were expected to control their weight with rigorious Aerobic exercise routines. Often being commanded by TV presenters such as Jane Fonda, Olivia Newton-John and Richard Simmons.

The movie almost seems like a call for women to reject all of these substances and fads. Making the argument that the only substance actresses should need is the substance of their character; their talent, their skill. Assuring us that true talent will win out despite the Entertainment Industry's misogynistic and ageist attitudes towards women.

The Substance is far from the only movie to explore the Entertainment Industry's attitude towards aging women during this year's Awards Season. 

In "Challengers" (2024) Zendaya plays two versions of her character Tashi Duncan. In the movie's present day Tashi Duncan is around 40 years old, yet was being played by the 27 year old Zendaya. This is a common practice in the Movie Industry with characters of women in their 40's and 50's being played by female actors in their 20's and 30's. Sometimes they're even playing the mothers of male actors who are also in their 20's and 30's. However in the flashback sequences of Challengers Zendaya also plays a version of Tashi Duncan who is around 18 years old. This is also a common practice in the Entertaiment Industry; actors of both genders in their 20's playing teenagers. Something Zendaya herself is famous for from her role in the TV show; "Euphoria" (2019-Present). 

Challengers seems to be asking the Entertainment Industry what is the mysterious point where it is no longer acceptable for actresses to play characters younger than they are and have to switch to playing characters which are much older than they are? The answer seems to be when they turn 18 and become adults in terms of labour laws and their ability to consent to nude and sex scenes.

In "The Brutalist" (2024) Raffey Cassidy plays Zsófia Tóth. She also plays Zsófia Tóth's own, unnamed, daughter. Essentially giving birth to herself. Raffey Cassidy also worked with The Brutalist director Brady Corbet on; "Vox Lux" (2018) in which she also gave birth to herself. Playing Celeste Montgomery and then Celeste's daughter Albertine Montgomery. Both The Brutalist and Vox Lux involve substantial time jumps. So while Raffey Cassidy plays her own daughter she is doing so at the age the mother had been and that Raffey Cassidy herself is. However it does touch on how actresses are given roles so much older than they are they sometimes find themselves playing the mothers of actors who are pretty much their own age.

Stacy Martin worked with Brady Corbet and Raffey Cassidy on both The Brutalist and Vox Lux. A big theme of this year's Awards Season is how her career has been impacted by the very sexually explicit; "Nymphomaniac" (2013). 

I think that Stacy Martin was around 22 years old when she made Nymphomaniac. However she plays the character Joe through a range of ages, from a young looking 15 through to 35. When Charlotte Gainsbourg takes over the character of Joe at 35 it's noticeable how much older the character suddenly appears. Despite Charlotte Gainsbourg only being around 42 years old. Only 7 years older than the character but almost twice the age of the actress who'd played the character in the previous shot. Despite a time jump significant enough for Raffey Cassidy to play her own daughter in Vox Lux Stacy Martin plays Eleanor Montgomery throughout. Apart from drawing everyone's attention to Stacy Martin's ability as an actor this also touches on how far you can go and how far you should go in terms of getting, particularly, actresses to play roles older and younger than themselves.

While many aging actresses must think that the Movie Industry still has a long way to go it really has improved in the last 20 years or so. It used to be that actresses would literally just disappear when they turned 40. Now it is common to see actresses not only continuing to work but also having successful careers into their 50's and 60's. Of the Best Actress Oscar winners of the past 15 years nine of them have been over 40. Making that the normal, with younger actresses like Mikey Madison, Emma Stone and Jennifer Lawrence the exception, rather than the rule.

Obviously it would be nice if that change was simply the result of the people who make up the Movie Industry undergoing personal growth and becoming better people. However I think that much maligned Social Media and the Internet in general has been a significant driver of this change. It used to that once an actress hit 40 no studio would cast them in a movie. With them not being cast in any movies no TV talkshows would book them as guests, no newspapers and magazines would bother interview them. Now actresses are able to communicate with their community of fans via Social Media without having to go through the gatekeepers of traditional media. 

As a result they don't disappear, even if they're not working. Being able to show studios that they still have large fanbases who want to see them in movies helps actresses to convince studios to put them in movies. Demi Moore's fanbase has been particularly vocal on Social Media during this Awards Season. Keen to see the 62 year old win her first Oscar for playing the 50 year old Elisabeth Sparkles.

As, predominately, a visual medium the Entertainment Industry is particularly harsh of women as they age. As is the Fashion Industry. However the issues that are acute within those industries also affect women in all walks of life. So rather than just looking at physical appearance The Substance also addresses other challenges that women face. 

In the workplace one uniquely Female challenge is Motherhood. At what would be considered the peak of a man's career women have to take a break of up to a couple of years in order to give birth and raise their children at a time when they need constant care. Demi Moore herself took a similar career break at the age of 35 to raise her daughters between 1998 and 2007. Her nomination at The Oscars 2025 could be seen has her career finally overcoming that break to catch up with her Male contemporaries in the; "Brat Pack" of 1980's. Sean Penn received his first Oscar nomination in 1996 and his first win in 2004. 

In The Substance Elisabeth Sparkles, essentially, gives birth to Sue. While they are supposed to be the same mind spilt between two bodies Elisabeth Sparkles and Sue think of themselves as two different people. They rapidly come to hate each other, fighting constantly. Something which is, no doubt, familiar to every mother of a teenage daughter. Or anyone who has ever been a teenage daughter.

In an interesting piece of casting Margaret Qualley is something of a Nepo Baby. Her actual mother is Andie MacDowell, one of Demi Moore's Brat Pack contemporaries. So a lot of the causes of conflicts between Elisabeth Sparkles and Sue represent the sort of Bourgeois rich people problems specific to the Hollywood elite and their Nepo Baby offspring. Things like excess illegal drug use, partying and casual sex.

At around 17:10 on 28/4/25 (UK date) it's highly unlikely I'll be able to pick this up tomorrow.

Edited at around 16:50 on 1/5/25 (UK date) to tidy all of the above and copy & paste; 

I'm not part of the Bourgeoisie. I'm not even part of the Proletariat. However if you are a member of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences (AMPAS), the Hollywood elite, watching the movie in your private cinema with your dreadful Nepo Babies. Then I think you're likely to find The Substance to be an intense Psychological Horror. The sort of movie that's constantly seeking out your private, inner-self and trying to stab you in it, repeatedly.

Of course it is not just the Entertainment Industry nor wider society that starts to lose interest woman by the time they reach 40 or 50 years old. It is also Biology, their own bodies. 

Women's reproductive cell is the Ovum or; "Egg." Each woman is born with all the Ovum she will ever have. At the onset of puberty, normally around 13 years old, woman experience the; "Menarche." The Ovaries start releasing one of these Ovum a month into the women's Uterus. If the Ovum is not fertilised by a man's reproductive cell, the Sperm, then it is expelled from the woman's Uterus via the Vaginal Canal. The release of each Ovum to the Uterus is accompanied by the release of the Hormone Oestrogen. The release of each Ovum from the Uterus is accompanied by the release of the Hormone Progesterone.

Between the ages of 40 and 50 years old most women have expelled all of the Ovum they have. So this monthly cycle comes to an end. The; "Menopause." The end of the release of Oestrogen has a massive impact on many aspects of women's bodies. One of the most immediate is that the Vaginal Canal stops producing lubrication, making it easier for it to be penetrated during sex; "Vaginal Dryness." The tissue of the Vaginal Canal also weakens, shrinking the size of the Vagina; "Vaginal Atrophy." It is almost as if at the age of 40-50 the doors to a woman's primary sexual organ, literally, slam shut.

The drop in Oestrogen also causes women's bones to lose density and weaken (Osteoporosis), making them easier to break. Oesterogen is essential for the production of Collagen so the drop in Oestrogen also causes a loss of Collagen which weakens the soft-tissues which protect the ends of bones within joints. Making them more susceptible to joint pain (Osteoarthritis). A lack of Collagen also causes hair to thin and skin to loosen and wrinkle. The drop in Oestrogen also affects the way that the body stores fat. Typically leading to more of it to build up in places like the belly and less of it to build up in places like the Breasts.

The monthly process of each Ovum itself is rarely regular and uniform. So the Menopause is not a single event, like flicking a switch on and off. Instead it can take around a decade. 

During this process around the Menopause - the; "Perimenopause" - Oestrogen levels spike and vary wildly. This can have a range of other impacts on women's bodies, alongside the effects of Menopause. These Perimenopause impacts are primarily related to the way the body regulates the flow of blood though vessels (Vasomotor Function). They include things like the inability to regulate body temperature (Hot Flashes), flushed skin, dizziness, heart palpitations and a loss of energy. Although the relationship between Perimenopause, Emotion and Cognition is not well understood it has been linked with impacts such as Depression and extremely mild Dementia (Brain Fog). They though could just be the effects of other impacts, such as not being able to sleep through the night due to Hot Flashes for example.

The Menses, the Perimenopause and the Menopause itself are all normal bodily functions. Rather like how breathing, eating and your hair growing are all normal bodily functions. However there are some bodily functions which make us more squeamish than others. Particularly sticky, smelly ones like going to the bathroom. People often use humour to distract themselves from those uncomfortable, squeamish feelings. So toilet humour is funny, wherever you go in the World.

Particularly amongst men the squeamishness around the Menses and associated bodily functions is particularly high. Something which is reflected by the shocking horror of all the blood, gore and bodily fluids in The Substance

Modern science is perfectly capable of synthesising chemicals which replicate naturally occurring Hormones; Synthetic Hormones. So the impacts of Menopause and Perimenopause can be mitigated through the use of Synthetic Hormones, typically Oestrogen and Progesterone. A similar combination of Synthetic Hormones can also be used to regulate the Menses and act against Conception (Contraception). Oestrogen to trigger the release of the Ovum to the Uterus then Progesterone to expel the Ovum from the Uterus before it has a chance to meet a Sperm and become fertilised.

A similar type of Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) is also used in Feminising Gender-Confirmation Treatment; changing a Transgender person's outwards appearance from Male to Female. However there are a number of differences. The most important being the dosage used. In Gender Confirmation Treatment much higher doses of Synthetic Hormones are used. 

The mix is also a little different. Sometimes Testosterone is used to mitigate the impacts of Menopause and Perimenopause, primarily to counter a drop in sex drive. Progesterone actually produces Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) which I'm tempted to describe as; "Testosterone on Steroids." Except that Oestrogen, Progesterone, Testosterone and DHT are all Steroids. In Feminising Gender-Confirmation Treatment much of the Synthetic Hormone Therapy revolves around DHT Inhibitors; chemicals which either prevent DHT from being produced in the first place or stop it having an effect.

It has long been an argument by women that even a Transgender person who has completed full Feminising Gender-Confirmation Treatment still cannot be considered a woman. Due to them lacking the experience of being a woman. The experiences of Gender-Based Violence and Menstruation being the most often cited. Both which sound like a massive nuisance to me, probably the scariest man most of you will ever meet. By the Menstruation benchmark there is certainly an argument that a Transgender person can be a post-Menopausal woman

Over the years I think I've got to know around half a dozen Transgender people who completed full Feminising Gender-Conformation treatment. Which, when you consider how rare Transgenderism actually is, is a pretty massive sample size. However these were people I just knew socially rather than was interviewing for a research project. I still got the general impression that they'd all spent their entire working lives saving up in order to afford Feminising Gender-Confirmation Treatment. In order to allow them to retire as non-sexual, post-Menopausal women.

The caveat being that on that Grand, Operatic, Crayola - or if you're so bad at science you decided to become a Biologist instead; "Micro" - scale a Transgender person who has fully completed Gender-Confirmation Treatment will still be tied to their original Biology. 

One of the most commonly used DHT Inhibitors has the generic name; "Finasteride." In very small doses Finasteride is sold as part of a snake-oil solution under brand-names such as; "Propeica" and; "Proscar" to convince men it combats hair loss. However I think it's just their shrinking genitals which convince them their pubic hair is growing longer. In much higher doses Finasteride is used to treat enlarged Prostates and cause Prostate Cancer, if you're that way inclined. Due to them not having much DHT to inhibit at those doses Finasteride causes Liver Failure in women. So they have to wear latex gloves, even while handling film-coated tablets. Meaning that if Elliot Page were to ever to end up as a minimum-wage care worker. That's something he would have to inform his employer about.

Menstruation and its phases; Arche, Pause, Peri-Pause are all normal bodily functions. However many of the impacts of, particularly, Menopause, can result in abnormal bodily functions. The sort of thing you want treated as a Medical Problem. The fractured and dislocated hips and crumbled spines associated with Osteoporosis are definitely the sort of things you want to have treated by a Doctor who actually knows what they're doing. So there is this constant conflict between whether Menopause and Perimenopause should be treated as a Medical Problem or just accepted as part of life. I don't think any of us enjoy having to wipe our own asses, yet we don't call an ambulance every time.

The term; "Menopause" was actually coined by the French Medical Student Charles-Pierre Louis de Gardanne in Paris in 1812. He and his contemporaries observed that although they experienced a permanent pause to their Menses Menopause wasn't a disorder or disease which affected women of the Peasant class; the Proletariat. It only affected rich women; the Bourgeois. Menopause is, literally, a Bourgeois affliction or; "Bougie Disease." A similar divide was found in Japan; Menopause is a Luxury Disease which only affects rich women. 

One possible explanation being that Bourgeois Trophy Wives are seen merely as; "Arts Décroatifs" where working women have a purpose beyond being pretty little sex toys. So are likely to suffer fewer adverse Emotional impacts to the gates slamming shut on their sexual organs. In an age before widespread contraception it was probably something to be welcomed by women who couldn't afford a; "Nanny" - etymologically an older woman who cares for her children's children. 

So in The Substances the mysterious blackmarket drug also serves as a metaphor for all the lotions & potions, Vaginal Lubricants, Vaginal Balms, HRT's and magical healing crystals that can be used to alleviate the impacts of Menopause and Perimenopause

It is the Menopause which causes the drop in Oestrogen which causes the loss of Collagen which causes saggy skin and wrinkles. So, technically, all the anti-aging skin-creams are actually treatments to alleviate the impacts of Menopause. Definitely not the sort of thing that should be used Premenarche. Not that anything that can be found between the crystals and the snake-oil on a lifestyle guru's Ecommerce platform is going to have much effect, negative or otherwise.

At around 17:20 on 1/5/25 (UK date) I am going to have to pause this now, in order to address a different phase in my life. I hope this pause will last less than a month.

Edited at around 15:15 on 23/6/25 (UK date) to refresh myself on the above and copy & paste; 

This issue of whether Perimenopausal women should be reduced to only being thought of as a Medical Problem doesn't just apply to the Menopause. It runs through the medical profession and wider society. I'm sure we can all still, just about, remember 2020. When we entirely reduced our societies to this clade and that strain, PCR and lateral flow tests. Just as I'm sure we all know that the lockdowns did not work. The vaccines did not work. Covid-19 is still very much with us. The only thing that's changed is our attitude. The people who spent their lives dreaming of the day there's a deadly Pandemic finally got it out of their systems and we're back to accepting Covid as just a part of life. Just as we did back in 2019. 

If we were to apply that reductionist attitude to Selena Gomez then we wouldn't be able to talk about her billion dollar Rare Beauty cosmetics company, the Rare Impact Fund Mental Health charity it supports. The acting awards she won for her role in; "Emilia Perez" (2024), the most nominated movie at The Oscars 2025 or her TV show; "The Only Murders in the Building" (2021-Present). We wouldn't be able to talk about Selena Gomez's successful music career that she seems able to dip in and out of as she pleases. We'd only be able to consider Selena Gomez as Bipolar Disorder and a Kidney Transplant as the result of Lupus. Likewise we wouldn't be able to talk about Elliot Page in terms of his acting career and accolades. Only the fact that he is Transgender makes him susceptible to Liver Failure from contact with  DHT inhibitors.

If you reduce Transgenderism in that way then you have to talk about it in terms of being a Birth Defect. Interestingly during pregnancy the Female Hormone Progesterone transforms into the Male Hormone DHT. It is this very powerful form of the Male Hormone Testosterone which drives the formation of Male genitalia in foetuses. So a lack of either Progesterone or DHT could be what causes a foetus which has Male DNA to develop into a child which has Female genitalia. The type of Transgender that Elliot Page seems to be. Likewise too much Progesterone or DHT could be what causes a foetus with Female DNA to develop into a child with Male genitalia.

The 2025 Awards Season has looked extensively at the Totalitarian Social Engineering central to The Brutalist school of Urban Planning, likening it to traditional computing. Along with its opposite, the Libertarian Social Ecology of the likes of Murray Bookchin. Something which actually contributed to the development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) computing.

Murray Bookchin's first book was; "Our Synthetic Environment" (1962) which was originally published under the pen-name; "Lewis Herber." This looked at how environmental pollutants affect the Human Endocrine System - the system which governs Hormones like Oestrogen, Progesterone, Testosterone and DHT. How those pollutants' effects on the Endocrine System can cause Cancers and Birth Defects. Later that year Rachel Carson published; "Silent Spring" which took a less politically radical look at the same issue. 

Combined these books had such a massive impact on the public consciousness that they totally changed the way that the public thought about pollution and how their environment shapes their lives. Leading to the removal of Dioxins from most consumer products and a total ban on the Pesticide DHT. They ushered in the birth of the Environmental Movement which continues to be common place in discussions over politics and the Social Contract across the globe.

Back in early January, around the start of The 2025 Awards Season the US Congress received an official report showing that 1 in 1000 American adolescents are undergoing Hormone based Gender-Confirmation treatment for Transgenderism. Which works out as 1 child in every High School in America. At the same time only 1 in 10,000 American adolescents are being treated for Cancer.

While it's far from the only way to think about it Transgenderism can certainly be considered as a Birth Defect, likely caused by environmental factors affecting the Endocrine system. When Murray Bookchin and Rachael Carson showed that environmental factors affecting the Endocrine system were causing childhood Cancers there was a first national, then international outrage. Huge public demand insisting that the pollutants be banned. We are now being asked to believe that Transgenderism is ten times more common in the US than Cancer. Yet rather than there being national outrage and demands that the pollutants causing it be found and banned people actually seem to be celebrating it.  

One likely explanation is that no-one really believes that the majority of people claiming to be Transgender are actually Transgender. They're just making it up for attention. Transgenderism is really significantly less common than Cancer in America. Rather than being the result of some pollutant the tiny handful of cases of Transgenderism are likely being caused by something going a bit wrong within the Endocrine system itself. Something as random and impossible to predict and guard against as the mother being annoyed by someone doing something small in some supermarket checkout queue or another. Causing the exactly the wrong level of a stress Hormone to be released at precisely the wrong moment during pregnancy.

If that's the case then America is facing another scandal. That one child in every US High School is being subjected to completely unnecessary, life-long and life-changing medical treatment. A national epidemic of Munchausen's Syndrome. Yet there's no mass outrage. Demands that the US government, America's Sovereign, protects America's children from these unethical, unscrupulous medical professionals who, no doubt, would perform Kidney Transplants on any child who wanted and was prepared to pay for one.

At around 16:00 on 23/6/25 (UK date) I'll pick this up on Wednesday, amateurish jump-scares permittting.

Edite at around 16:30 on 25/6/25 (UK date) to copy & paste;

Perhaps showing how the Entertainment Industry is changing for the better Demi Moore has worked pretty consistently since returning from her career break in 2007

In 2020 she appeared in the NBC/Peacock adaptation of; "Brave New World" based on the 1932 novel by Aldous Huxley. Playing "Linda," the mother of the gifted storyteller from the Savage Lands the futuristic, Socially Engineered Utopian city was trying to tame and intergrate. As with George Orwell's later, 1949 novel; "1984" Brave New World is an attempt to warn about the Totalitarian Social Engineering that was inspired by; "Metropolis" (1927) and went onto inspire both Nazism and The Brutalist School of Urban Planning. In its visual style the 2020 adaptation of Brave New World borrows heavily from Metropolis.

The female lead in Brave New World (2020) is played by Jessica Brown Findlay who is probably best known for her role in the TV show; "Downton Abbey" (2010-2015). However people who only know Jessica Brown Findlay from Downton Abbey will probably be unaware that she's an actress who seems very comfortable with onscreen nudity. 

In 2014 Jessica Brown Findlay had nude photos and videos of her stolen by hackers and leaked on the Internet. I cannot remember if this was part of the same massive leak of celebrity nudes that included Jennifer Lawrence as I didn't pay it much attention at the time. Although I remember reading it as a headline in a newspaper and flamboyantly turning the page without reading the story while thinking; "That seems like a waste of effort. Downton Abbey's the only thing I've seen her in where she's kept her clothes on!"

As I was watching Brave New World (2020) I increasingly came to regret not paying more attention to Jessica Brown Findlay's leaked nudes as it became obvious that they were a big subtext to the show. Part of wider discussion about the increasing blurring of the line between actor and sex-worker. Then through hacks, leaks and Internet Porn sites, now through AI. Along with how to minimise the negative impacts on the people who appear in nude and sex scenes. That big theme of The Oscars 2025, one which disproportionately affects women in the Entertainment Industry.

A particularly notable sex scene in Brave New World (2020) involves Hannah John-Kamen playing "Wilhelmina - "Helm" - Watson." A character who, very deliberately, shares the same first name and initials as Richard Wagner's first wife. The sex scene is notable for the way in which it doesn't show Hannah John-Kamen's nipples, in a show which features a lot of nipples, nude and simulated sex scenes. 

If you've seen really any US network TV show regulated by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) then you'll know how it is possible to do even very graphic sex scenes without showing nipples in such a fluid and natural way you don't even notice. 

This sex scene from Brave New World (2020) was different from that. It was as if a censor or the actress' agent had forced their way onto set and was holding a metal bar in place to stop the camera panning down to show her nipples. In order to protect either our morals or her modesty. It felt very unnatural and forced, really drawing attention to the fact that they weren't showing Hannah John-Kamen's nipples. All the while you're sitting there thinking; "That we can't see her nipples doesn't change the fact she's fully nude in a vast warehouse-like room surrounded by a gang of, essentially, scaffolders!" Although you could argue that it protected her modesty from having footage of her nipples appearing all over the Internet, alongside Jessica Brown Findlay's nipples.

Margaret Qualley's previous work also touches on that big theme of actors as sex-workers. Her breakthrough role came in the US TV show; "The Leftovers" (2014-2017) where she played; "Jill Garvey." In the first season her best friend was played by Emily Meade, a very sexually precocious character who is constantly trying to seduce her best friend's middle-aged father into an inappropriate relationship. I can't remember if Emily Meade actually appeared nude in The Leftovers but not being regulated by the FCC it is certainly a show which has nude and sex scenes in it.

One particularly memorable nude scene involves Jasmin Savoy Brown's character and her group of female friends, who are all around the same age as Emily Meade's character, running fully nude through the woods. For reasons the show doesn't even begin to attempt to explain. The Leftovers being the sort of show that takes a great deal of pleasure in not explaining its many mysteries. 

US law defines Pornography as material which depicts nudity or sexual acts for the sole purpose of exciting lascivious feelings. In order to not be classed as Pornography nude and sex scenes in movies and TV shows need to serve some purpose other than exciting those lascivious feelings. They need to contribute to the plot in some way, for example. Not only did this nude scene in The Leftovers not contribute to the plot and felt completely unearned it made absolutely no sense. The only explanation I can think of is that it was a deliberate reference to a similar scene in the 2013 movie; "How I Live Now."

How I Live Now revolves around the "Daisy Rybeck" character played by Saoirse Ronan. A teenager of about 17 or 18 years old Daisy is visiting Britain from America and falls in love with "Eddie" played by George Mackay. The two are then separated amid the aftermath of a Nuclear Terrorist Attack. The early part of the movie, before the attack, is almost all building towards a sex scene between Daisy and Eddie. 

Aged just 13 Saoirse Ronan was nominated for Best Supporting Actress at The Oscars 2008 for her breakthrough role in; "Atonement" (2007). How I Live Now was really the cute 13 year old actress' first role since turning 18 and being able to appear in nude and sex scenes. So as the movie builds towards the inevitable sex scene you find yourself sitting there, almost praying; "Please don't be creepy! Please don't be creepy! Please don't be creepy!" 

When the sex scene comes it is very tastefully done in a way that even the FCC would allow. It's just enough to establish the nature of Daisy and Eddie's relationship. Making it clear that they're more than just good friends, they're each other's all important first true love. Then later on in the movie there's a dream sequence in which Saoirse Ronan is running fully nude through the woods. It's the Horror movie using her full-frontal nudity as a jump-scare. Which has got to be a rather dubious thing to have said about yourself.

Following The Leftovers Emily Meade went on to have a rather central role another HBO TV show; "The Deuce" (2017-2019). Arguably The Deuce is a show about Urban Geography. It tells the story of the section of 42nd Street between Seventh Avenue and Eighth Avenue in New York City in the 1970/80's, how all the characters interact with and are defined by that small piece of a city. Many of the characters being shaped by The Deuce at that time are sex-workers, including Emily Meade's "Sarah/Lori Madison." So it includes many examples of actors as sex-workers, such as in; "Anora" (2024).

Initially the sex-workers are drug addicted street prostitutes. However some of them gradually also become Porn actors. First in movies shown in Porn Cinemas and then in movies released on newly invented VHS tapes, which people can own and watch at home. What allows this journey into Porn to begin is the relaxation of New York State's Obscenity Laws. I can't remember the exact quote but a lawyer describes the change by saying something like; "The Courts are increasingly finding that New Yorkers don't have any morals to outrage!" Rather like how the German public didn't seem to have any morals left to outrage during The Weimar Republic, allowing it to become the gay capital of the World for a time.

Particularly for Emily Meade's character her Porn journey is driven by the rise of the new technology of VHS tapes. This sees her become a Porn Star, crossing into the mainstream appearing in music videos for rock bands in the 1980's. Margaret Qualley's spandex clad scenes in The Substance seem deliberately similar to her The Leftovers co-star Emily Meade's spandex clad scenes as a 1980's Porn Star in The Deuce.

At around 16:45 on 25/6/25 (UK date) I should be able to pick this up tomorrow.

Edited at around 15:25 on 30/6/25 (UK date) to substantially tidy the above and copy & paste;

Invoking Emily Meade's journey from Prostitute to Porn Star in The Deuce enables The Substance to discuss how Public Morals towards, particularly, sex and nudity shift. Compared to the wider world of movie making The Oscars seems to have extremely prudish and restrictive Public Morals. Only movies which are very safe, very tame and very mainstream seem to get nominated. Through things like the nomination of; "Poor Things" (2023) at The Oscars 2024 there seems to be a feeling that The Oscars should be more open-minded in the type of movies it considers. After all the movies aren't actually shown during the televised ceremony. The idea of the ceremony is to encourage you to go to a movie theatre to watch the movies, if you can prove that you are of an appropriate age. 

Obviously sex and nudity isn't the only area in which The Oscars is restrictive in the type of movies it considers. However it's been said so many times that it's almost a cliché to point out that American audiences seem to be fine with any level of violence, yet are utterly terrified by sex. While it does have some sexual themes and sex scenes they are really only a small part of The Substance which is, primarily, a Horror movie. Much has been said around its nomination that Horror is genre The Oscars normally tends to avoid. Despite the Horror genre being one of the big money makers for movie theatres. People want to go and be scared in part of a collective group, rather than alone at home. The visual style of The Substance also seems to reference; "Base-moi" (2000). A movie which turned sex-workers into actors and features very erotic violence and very non-erotic sex scenes.

Referencing The Deuce also allows for discussion about what Pornography is and how it's regulated. Serving as a metaphor for how to better protect the people who have to appear in nude and sex scenes. Questions such as while it might be acceptable to ask people, particularly women, to do nude and sex scenes which are genuinely essential to the plot is it acceptable to demand nude and sex scenes simply to boost ticket sales by appealing to those salacious, lascivious feelings we all have? Should it be a rule or industry "law" that intimacy coordinators be compulsory for nude and sex scenes?

The Deuce also allows for an exploration of how technology changes the way in which nude and sexual content is consumed. You suspect that the nude and sex scenes in The Substance, or any other movie mentioned, are consumed differently by viewers in a packed public movie theatre to how some viewers are consuming them when they are streaming them in the privacy of their own homes. Particularly if they're streaming them on Internet Porn sites. Thanks to AI the, mainly actresses, don't even have to have consented to the creation of the nude and sex scenes which are being streamed on Internet Porn sites in that way. Further contributing to the questions over regulation, such as the use of Copyright to prevent genuine and AI generated nude and sexual content appearing on Internet Porn site. Should it be an industry "law" that studios have to enforce the removal of that content on behalf of the people featured?

Using former co-stars Margaret Qualley and Emily Meade to draw the comparison between The Substance and The Deuce is actually rather clever. Since making The Leftovers Emily Meade has gone on to appear in a lot of nude and simulated sex scenes, which are probably all over Internet Porn sites now. Whereas The Substance features Margaret Qualley's first nude and simulated sex scenes. In a lot of the coverage surrounding The Oscars 2025 that I skimmed, rather than read Margaret Qualley did comment on how she didn't enjoy doing the nude and simulated sex scenes and is hoping to avoid them in future. Maybe Emily Meade feels the same way but doesn't have the luxury of being a Nepo Baby with powerful parents in her corner?

Following The Leftovers Margaret Qualley had a small role in; "Once Upon a Time... in Hollywood" (2019). While I don't mean it as an insult I should mention that Quentin Tarantino's work has always left me cold. In my opinion he seems far more interested in the nerdy, technical processes of movie making rather than making movies. Such as when he used 65mm film to shoot; "The Hateful Eight" (2015). Then was forced to transfer it to standard 70mm film as all the movie theatres turned round and said; "Yeah, we're not going to buy new projectors just to show your movie." As the words; "You pretentious tw*t!" hung in the air, unspoken.

In Once Upon a Time...in Hollywood Margaret Qualley appeared alongside Mikey Madison, who won Best Actress for her role in Anora. Mikey Madison appeared in; "Scream" (2022) alongside Jasmin Savoy Brown. Who appeared alongside Margaret Qualley in The Leftovers. Which is the sort of full circle moment which made me smile.

Some of you may remember that back in 2021 the CIA tried to shock the World into submission. Putting around the twin rumours that Miley Cyrus is bisexual and maybe, just maybe, she menstruates. The storyline of Miley Cyrus' journey from naive good girl into a bisexual punk-rock chick seems to have been lifted directly from The Deuce. The journey of the "Abigail - "Abbi" - Parker." Played by Margarita Levieva, a Russian-born Jew who first migrated to the "Little Odessa" area of New York City.

Following The Deuce Emily Meade went onto appear in Amazon MGM's "Dead Ringers" (2023). This centres around Rachel Weisz playing twin, female gynaecologists. It immediately gets very graphic in its portrayal of female reproductive health, including menstruation and menopause. Then just stays there for six hours. Emily Meade plays the lesbian wife of "Rebecca Parker," played by Jennifer Earle. The benefactor of the non-lesbian twin.

So you do have to wonder who the CIA thought it was going to shock with its Miley Cyrus prank. Presumably someone who has never seen a TV show, movie or read an Elementary School biology textbook. The Great American Bell Ringing of October 2021 really seemed inevitable.

In real life Rachel Weisz is, essentially, married to Daniel Craig. The outgoing James Bond. Although we were almost supposed to mistake her for a body-double Margaret Qualley performed as part of a musical tribute to James Bond during The Oscars 2025 ceremony. Wearing a menstrual red dress.

Dead Ringers (2023) can also be used to provide something of a cautionary tale about binge-watching. It was the first series or serial that I streamed on Amazon Prime Video. I realised there were six instalments and I had six days left on my subscription. So I decided to binge-watch them day-after-day. Something rather crucial to the plot happens right at the end of the fourth instalment. Having over-indulged by that point I was no longer paying the right amount of attention. Which made it quite hard to understand the remaining two instalments.

Of course some streaming serials are now intended to be binge-watched. Running the instalments together of several hours, let alone days. Rather like how movies used to be in serial form. Until they started running the instalments together over the course of many hours. Such as ridiculous number of hours that they need an intermission, in the case of; The Brutalist (2024).

At around 16:25 on 30/6/25 (UK date) I've just got one more movie to research and write about now.




To be continued in Part 8.

13:02 on 18/7/25 (UK date).

Monday, 21 April 2025

Let's All Go To The Movies. Pt.6.

Best read as a continuation of Part 5; https://watchitdie.blogspot.com/2025/04/lets-all-go-to-movies-pt5.html

Emilia Pérez (2024): This is something of a difficult movie for me to cover as it features Selena Gomez. Someone who has been nudged in my direction, largely due to her well publicised health issues; Lupus, a kidney transplant as a result of Lupus and Bipolar Disorder. Although I should point out that small nudge was nothing like on the same scale of the massive, collective, shove others have received.

Selena Gomez is a Billionaire from her Rare Beauty cometic company, part of the profits of which are channelled into the Rare Impact Fund to enable to young people to gain access to mental health resources. Selena Gomez had a role in this, the most nominated movie at The Oscars 2025, a role which saw her win the Best Actress prize at The Cannes Film Festival 2024. That is alongside her role in the multi-award winning TV show; "Only Murders in the Building" (2021-Present). Selena Gomez also has a successful music career she seems able to dip in and out of as she pleases. So there is clearly a lot more to Selena Gomez than just her health issues.

I particularly don't want to focus on Selena Gomez's health issues because they are personal and private. I also appreciate that, particularly with mental health issues, there is still a lot of stigma surrounding them. The specifics of how Selena Gomez's health issues would affect anyone, along with the side-effects of the treatments used, can be quite embarrassing. Not the sort of things that people feel comfortable talking about. Recently Selena Gomez expressed concern that the medications she is taking for her health issues may prevent her from becoming a Mother. Particularly the kidney transplant requires her to be on some pretty heavy duty drugs for the rest of her life. As these drugs prevent her body from rejecting the donor kidney stopping taking them from anywhere between nine months and two years simply isn't an option. All of which is a bit much for a first date.

However Selena Gomez's health issues are really the reason why she was being nudged in my direction. For every one of Selena Gomez's health issues that I know about I also know, and am probably related to, someone who has the exact same health issue. Back in late 2017 one of my Mothers was admitted to a hospital's Intensive Care/Treatment Unit (IC/TU) with a Lupus-like autoimmune condition. Partly to protect my Mother's privacy rather than explaining to people exactly what was wrong with her I pretty much just told people to Google Selena Gomez.

As a result in my family and social circle these embarrassing discussions about the health issues Selena Gomez shares have been had so many times they've lost all power to embarrass. They've become the sort of thing we need to be reminded not to talk about loudly in public places, as they make other people uncomfortable. So if Selena Gomez has absolutely no-one else in her life to talk about her health issues with without embarrassment then I could certainly be that person. Although I would say that being united by our problems sounds like a terribly unhealthy basis for a romantic relationship. Excellent for an Alcoholics Anonymous-style support group but absolutely terrible for a couple.

Apparently since being nudged in my direction Selena Gomez is now engaged to Benny Blanco. The small faction that was nudging Selena Gomez in my direction also felt the need to murder a 10 year old girl, Sara Sharif, by pushing her down some stairs. Then have her killers flee to Pakistan to create a fully fledged international incident. None of which has made me want to get more involved. However the news that Selena Gomez is engaged to Benny Blanco has appeared in front of my eyes and gone into my brain. Forcing my brain to do something with that information. Selena Gomez and Benny Blanco seem to be united by something they both enjoy doing, making music. That seems a much healthier basis for a romantic relationship than any romantic relationship I would have had with Selena Gomez. Plus they both seem to live on the same continent, which probably helps.

Emilia Pérez centres on Rita Mora Castro, played by Zoe Saldaña, a struggling lawyer in Mexico. One day she is employed by drug cartel boss Jaun "Manitas" Del Monte, played by Karla Sofía Gascón, who wants her help to fake his death and transition to a new life as a woman. Rita Mora Castro duly obliges.

However that is really only a prelude or prologue. The story really begins four years later when Rita Mora Castro has a chance meeting with Manitas. Now identifying as a woman, Emilia Pérez. It turns out that transitioning to live as a woman has not brought Manitas the happiness they had hoped for. So they employ Rita Mora Castro's services again. This time to allow Emilia Pérez to return to Mexico to reunite with their family without the knowledge of Manitas' wife Jessica "Jessi" Del Monte, played by Selena Gomez. Back in Mexico Emilia Pérez and Rita Mora Castro unite to establish a charity organisation to campaign against Cartel Violence.

As such Emilia Pérez is a movie all about Transgenderism, that topic which is just so fashionable in America at the moment. There are only two genders; Male and Female. Those genders are determined at conception by the Father's DNA. However in a very small number of people something goes a bit wrong in how that DNA blueprint is built into the finished article. As a result those people end up being both Male and Female. They transcend both genders. 

For a lot of Transgender people this isn't an issue. They're perfectly happy with the gender their public image presents to mainstream society. However some Transgender people, like Manitas, feel they would be happier if their other gender was the public image they present to mainstream society. So they undergo gender-confirmation treatment in order to present their other gender as their public image. Whatever public image Transgender people choose to present to mainstream society; the day, the light, their private, inner-self; the night, the dark, will always be a Transgender person. It's never a matter of a man changing into a woman or vice-versa. It is always a Transgender person choosing which public image they wish to present.

This is something the movie establishes early on when Rita Mora Castro travels to Tel Aviv, Israel to meet with Dr Wasserman, played by Mark Ivanir, the Doctor who ultimately performs Manita's gender-confirmation treatment. The meeting takes the form of a duet sung between the two; "Lady," in which Dr Wasserman makes clear to Rita Mora Castro that he can only fix the body, not the soul. If the soul is a he then she will be a he.

Emilia Pérez's unhappiness is Manitas' failure to reconcile with his Male gender. The return to Mexico and the establishment of the charity to combat Cartel Violence is an attempt by Emilia Pérez to reconcile with Manita's Male gender. Violence is a genetically pre-determined Male trait. Over the years I've got to know many women who have served in the military and/or are accomplished at Combat Sports. I don't know Rhonda Rousey, however she seems a famous example of the type of woman I'm talking about who is probably easy for you to Google. Despite these women being much more experienced and trained in violence than I am I've found that just by virtue of being Male I will always be that fraction of a second quicker to violence than them. So the movie's use of Cartel Violence as an expression of Emilia Pérez's Male gender also touches on the Machismo culture of Latin America which drives much violence, particularly gender-based violence.

Karla Sofía Gascón are themselves Transgender. Choosing in 2014 to undergo gender-confirmation treatment in order to present their Female gender in public rather than their Male gender, Juan Carlos Gascón, which had already had a reasonably successful acting career. The second most nominated movie at The Oscars 2025 was; "The Brutalist" (2024). During Awards Season this sort of played about with the fourth wall, the invisible divide between performance and audience, by becoming engulfed in a bit of a scandal over the help it received from Artificial Intelligence (AI). Emilia Pérez also played about with the fourth wall as we were all forced to face up to the violence of Gascón's Male gender. In the form of a number of damaging Twitter and Social Media posts from their past.

A great many Social Media posts were unearthed and they were almost all in Spanish. So I can't say I've gone through them in any level of detail. However a particularly controversial group attacked Black Lives Matter and the death of George Floyd. Keeping with the Awards Season theme that Black Lives Matter supporters need a lesson in Objective Reality, a brutal reality check. At the time of his death George Floyd had an, above average, Blood/Oxygen Saturation of 98%. He most certainly could breath. He died of a Cardio-Pulmonary Arrest as a result of his choice to take a large dose of Fentanyl. The only person who killed George Floyd was George Floyd.

Another particularly controversial group of Gascón's Social Media posts attacked Islam's attitudes towards women. There are currently around 1.9 billion Muslims in the World. With the role of Caliph unfilled there is no central leader of Islam codifying the religion's teachings. So there is quite a range of variation amongst the beliefs of those 1.9 billion people. However there are large factions of Islam which have seriously problematic attitudes towards women. The Taliban being, probably, the most high profile example. Although driven by a deep Anti-Semitic hatred of Jews rather than any specific Islamic attitude towards women The October 7th Genocide (2023-Present) was marked by gender-violence so appalling it, prima facie, constitutes Crimes Against Humanity, contrary to Article 7.1(g) of The Rome Statute (1998).

The people who support Black Lives Matter tend to be the same sort of American Liberals who deny that large sections of Islam has a real problem with women while being also big supporters of both Hamas and Transgender rights. So this group of Social Media posts seemed to offer them another brutal reality check. Likening their support for Transgender rights to the gender-based violence of Hamas and the denial of women's rights by Islamic groups such as the Taliban.

Another large group of Gascón's Social Media posts seemed to involve them being, well, bitchy. About The Oscars themselves and a wide variety of celebrities, including Selena Gomez. As far as I can tell all women absolutely hate each other. While I've been actively avoiding getting involved even I know Selena Gomez and Hailey Bieber are supposed to be engaged in some great bitchy feud over Justin Bieber, who dated Selena before marrying Hailey. Gascón's Social Media posts struck me as a Male trying to copy that Female bitchiness and not getting it quite right due to it not being in their nature. Similar to how; "Challengers" (2024) seemed like an attempt to graft Male Homosexuality onto Heterosexual women.

I do not point out that people cannot change their gender, their nature, merely the public image their present of themselves in order to be hurtful or spiteful. I do it in order to explain how difficult it is to be Transgender, never being truly Male or truly Female. I would hope that amongst non-Sociopaths that would inspire feelings of patience and understanding, rather than hate.

However Awards Season is really the period of mass public engagement which America uses to renegotiate its Social Contract. That sort of unwritten balance of compromises which holds any society together. What Transgender activists seem to have forgotten is that we all experience this conflict between our private, inner-self and the public image we present to mainstream society. As explored in Richard Wagner's use of night, dark and day, light in; "Tristan Und Isolde." Something which was borrowed by Pytor Tchaikovsky's; "Swan Lake" and Lars von Trier's "Melancholia" (2011). It was explored more recently by; "Poor Things" (2023) at The Oscars 2024.

As is always the case when it comes to negotiating a Social Contract the question is how much of their private, inner-self should non-Transgender people be asked to sacrifice in order that Transgender people don't have to sacrifice their private, inner-self? A lot of women consider it to be a sacrifice of their private, inner-self to have to get undressed in front of a man. Is it acceptable to force them to make that sacrifice in order to prevent a Transgender person from having to make the sacrifice of being reminded that they'll never, truly, be a woman? I think even more women consider sexual violence to be a violation of their private, inner-self. Would it be more reasonable to force a Transgender perpetrator of sexual violence to serve their sentence in a male prison rather than force women who have abided by the Social Contract to sacrifice that part of their private, inner-self?

Arguably Humans are pretty much the same wherever you go in the World. They've also been pretty much the same for tens of thousands of years. Tellingly early on in Emilia Pérez Rita Mora Castro visits Bangkok, Thailand to research gender-confirmation treatments. Thailand is something of a global leader in this area because its culture has, really, always accepted Transgenderism as something which exists. So when it comes to negotiating a Social Contract there aren't really any new issues, just new compromises to be found on old issues.

However our understanding of these old issues has improved and expanded. That better knowledge changes the compromises we make. DNA was first identified back in 1869. Similar subsequent scientific discoveries have allowed us to establish that there are only two genders but a tiny minority of people are both genders. So we know and can prove that Transgenderism exists. So we now know that in the balance of a Social Contract there is no point giving any weight to the private, inner-selves of people who don't think Transgenderism is real and that people who claim to be Transgender are only making it up and don't deserve any rights.

Of course for both Transgender and non-Transgender people it is possible to focus far too much on that conflict between our private, inner-self and the public image of ourselves we present to mainstream society. In so much of our daily lives it just really isn't an issue. It might sound like Woke virtue signalling to tell you that I really wouldn't care if I went into a shop and the person serving me was Transgender. However the truth is that I just don't care that much about the private, inner-self of someone who is briefly serving me in a shop. Their hopes, fears, gender or sexual orientation.

Likewise if The Great American Bell Ringing of 2021 hadn't happened and Selena Gomez and I were talking to each other directly, rather than freaking each other out with this post, I certainly wouldn't greet her by saying; "Hello Kidney Transplant!" Likewise the people who watch Selena Gomez on TV shows and in movies, listen to her music, buy her cosmetics or fantasise about her with no clothes on aren't interested in her private, inner-self. It has absolutely no impact of the way they interact with her. It's not callous or uncaring to say that that the interaction between them and Selena Gomez is almost entirely governed by the almost illusionary public image that she presents to mainstream society. As is almost every interaction between all Humans, anywhere in the World, throughout history.

The caveat to that is that the majority of the thinkers on the idea of a Social Contract, starting with John Locke, have argued that it can only exist if it is enforced. So discussion over where to draw the compromises in a Social Contract have to be translated into enforceable laws. When writing laws, as with providing healthcare, you have to deal in Objective Reality rather than Expressionist Illusion. As Christian-Scientist Val Kilmer recently demonstrated.

At around 17:05 on 21/4/25 (UK date) I'm not sure when I'll be able to pick this up again.

Edited at around 17:25 on 22/4/25 (UK date) to tidy the above and copy & paste;

The question of where to strike the balance on Transgenderism in America's Social Contract is complicated by the fact the issue has become just so fashionable. 

Just before the start of the 2025 Awards Season, back in January, the US Congress received a report confirming that 1 in 1000 US adolescents were undergoing gender-confirmation treatment. That works out as roughly one child at every American High School. For context only 1 in 10,000 US adolescents are undergoing treatment for Cancer. The claim that Transgenderism is 10 times more common than Cancer in America is just not believable. If one child in every American High School had Cancer then there would be national outrage. The US Department of Health would be working flat-out, under huge pressure, to find out what is causing so many American children to suffer from a medical condition which requires significant surgical interventions and lifelong drug therapies.

Probably a big part of this is that it is just Human nature to seek out the rare, the new, the exciting. Back in the time of The Weimar Republic (1918-1932), when; "Metropolis" (1927) was made everyone in Europe was similarly obsessed with Asia, the East, the Orient. The height of fashion were Art Deco designs in the shape of a Japanese folding fan featuring light and dark colours. To allow people to experience illusion of the rare heat and exotic animals of the land of the rising sun. 

Another big part of the reason why Transgenderism is so fashionable is probably that a lot people's private, inner-self is a very dark place indeed. Obviously they don't what to project that public image to mainstream society. So instead they choose to signal the image of a virtuous person who really cares for marginalised groups, like the Transgender. The thinking seeming to be that it doesn't matter if they rape little children, they must be a good person because they'd never address anyone by the wrong pronoun(!)

Probably another big part of the reason why Transgenderism has become so fashionable is that life is hard. Both Transgender and non-Transgender people have this constant struggle of the conflict between their private, inner-self and the public image they project to society. 

As if it were part of some sort of Authoritarian-Capitalist master-plan inspired by The Brutalist School of Urban Design we are living increasingly socially isolated lives. When we do interact with other people it is on that very superficial, transactional level where we don't really care about each other's private, inner-selves, we barely notice the public images being presented to society. In America it's become increasingly fashionable to complain about not being; "Seen." People feeling that they're barely being noticed, no-one cares about their hopes and fears. Throughout the More Economically Developed world there is said to be a loneliness epidemic.

One way to make sure that you are; "Seen," receiving the attention we all crave is to appeal that that facet of Human nature by making yourself seem rare, new, exciting. During the time of The Weimar Republic that would have involved pretending to be Asian or Oriental. As Margaretha MacLeod did, renaming herself; "Mata Hari." These days it seems to involve pretending that you're Transgender.

I've yet to be convinced there is anything new about the Human condition. However this modern sensation that not even our public images are enough to be seen by mainstream society seems to be intensifying the conflict with our private inner-selves. The question of what is so wrong with our inner-selves, our personalities, that prevents us from projecting a public image that people will see and notice?

Thailand has a culture which has, really, always accepted Transgenderism as something which exists. As with much of Asia Thailand doesn't really have religion in the way that followers of Christianity and Islam would understand it. Instead it has more of a belief system based on the Animist idea that everything in the Universe is connected. One of the most widely recognised symbols of this collection of Asian Animist belief systems is that Yin Yang Symbol from Taoism. This represents the need for balance between two conflicting forces. That can be any two conflicting forces; light and dark for example. However in the West it is most probably known to represent the two conflicting forces of Male and Female. What is notable about the Yin Yang is that the large force has a small part of the opposing force within it. So there is a black dot within the white and a white dot within the black. Showing that even conflicting forces are interconnected and contain a small part of each other.

Transgender people are both Male and Female at the same time. However it is possible to be exclusively Male in gender yet have some Female personality traits and vice-versa. There certainly isn't only one Male personality and only one Female personality. While I find that as a man I will always be quicker to violence than a woman I know plenty of men who are much quicker to violence than I am. I also know plenty of men who are much slower to violence than I am. 

With the stress of conflict seemingly force us to constantly question what is wrong with our private, inner-selves it might seem like an easy solution to confuse personality traits with gender. It's more comforting to tell ourselves that our problems are the result of us being Transgender and presenting the wrong gender as the public image of ourselves rather than admitting that we've just got quite a dull personality. Something which is particularly true when Transgenderism is considered the rare, exotic, new thing that not only does everyone want to see, they want to be seen with.

There is a widely recognised and serious psychological disorder called; "Munchausen's Syndrome." The sufferer will invent a fake medical condition, the rarer and more exotic the better, in order to "Seen" by Doctors and revel in the attention that comes with being ill. It's a massively amplified version of that thing we all did when we were kids of pretending to be sick to get out of school. The disorder is probably more commonly recognised as; "Munchausen's By-Proxy." In which the sufferer inflicts the fake illness on a proxy, a person under their care. In order to be "Seen" by Doctors and revel in the attention that comes from being a virtuous person who cares from the sick.

I don't think there is a Doctor on the planet who would subject a patient to a kidney transplant simply because the patient wants a kidney transplant. They would first need to establish there is a medical need for the patient to have a kidney transplant. If they're unable to find a medical need they would subject the patient to intensive psychological screening in order to find out what has gone so wrong with their personality that they've convinced themselves they need kidney transplant.

Gender-confirmation treatment is hugely medically invasive. Early in Emilia Pérez there is the song; "La vaginoplastia" in which the Doctor in Bangkok reels off to Rita Mora Castro the surgical procedures involved. In what I thought was a missed opportunity it doesn't even begin to mention the lifetime of drug therapies involved. The medical profession is still guided by the Hippocratic Oath part of which states; "First do no harm." So as part of accepting that Transgenderism is a real medical condition and some people with the condition will benefit from gender-confirmation treatment medical ethics dictates that you have to establish there is a medical need for treatment, including intensive psychological screening. You don't perform gender-confirmation treatment just because the patient says they want it.

Obviously the people who are only pretending to be Transgender for attention and the people who are suffering from a Munchausen's like psychological disorder which has convinced them they are Transgender. They can't pass that medical scrutiny. So have started to demand that they can self-diagnose as Transgender and change the gender they wish to present in the legal sphere at will.

That makes it much harder to reach a balance of compromise on Transgender rights within the Social Contract. It certainly makes it much more difficult to convince people that Transgender people do deserve rights because Transgenderism is a real thing and they're not just making it up for attention when the overwhelming majority of people claiming to be Transgender are just making it up for attention. None of us should be asked, let alone forced, to sacrifice any part of our private, inner-self to accommodate other people's desperate need for attention and utter refusal to address their own flaws.

At around 17:55 on 22/4/25 (UK date) I'll try and pick this up tomorrow.

Edited at around 17:15 on 24/4/25 (UK date) to tidy all of the above and copy & paste;

Alongside Christianity and Islam Judaism is one of the Abrahamic religions. However it began as a polytheistic religion. Jews worshipped many different gods representing different aspects of existence. So you had Hadad - the god of Storms and Rain, Yam - the god of Seas and Water Sources along with Maloch - the god of Human Sacrifice, as depicted in; "Metropolis (1927)." As such Judaism is much closer to Asian Animist belief systems than Islam and Christianity are. They view God as something of a conceptual other, an old man with a beard living in a different dimension - Heaven. While Jews consider G0d to be the dimension Humans live in, the Universe. This tends to make Jews much more tolerant of things like Transgenderism. Taking the position that if G0d is the Universe and something exists in the Universe it must also be G0d, particularly if it is Jewish.

In recent years much of the debate over Transgenderism in America and Europe has involved trying to explain the difference between a Transgender person and a Drag Act. A Drag Act being a comedy character, rather like a Clown. Much of the comedy often comes from the fact that we're not meant to believe it is a man that has changed into a woman. We're meant to know that it's clearly a man dressed as a woman. All the way back in 1998 Israel won The Eurovision Song Contest while being represented by Sharon Cohen, a Transgender woman adopting the Drag Persona of Dana International. Obviously that was intended to provoke some debate in Israel, although nowhere near as much as you would expect. Certainly much less then the topic is provoking in America and Europe nearly thirty years later. Due to the similarities of their belief systems Israel really rivals Thailand as a World leader in gender-confirmation treatments.

Although he appeared in an episode of the very; "R.U.R: Rossimovi Univerzalni Roboti" (Rossum's Universal Robots) inspired US TV show; "Dollhouse" (2009-2010) Mark Ivanir is probably best known to US audiences for his role in; "Homeland" (2011-2020). In the show which was well connected to the actual Intelligence Community Mark Ivanir played the Russian Intelligence Officer or; "Spy" Ivan Krupin between 2015 and 2018, at the height of the Obama-Biden Regime's attempts to rig the 2016 US Election with its Russian Interference conspiracy theory. 

Homeland is a remake of an Israeli TV show; "Hatufim" (Abductees) (2010-2012). Mark Ivanir is Israeli, rather than Russian. Like almost all Israelis he did compulsory military service in the Israeli Defence Forces (IDF) where he worked in Military Intelligence. So technically Mark Ivanir is actually a former Spy. His role in Homeland very much mocked the Obama-Regime's claim of interference from Russian spies. The Russian spy isn't real. He was actually an Israeli spy.

During his time in Israeli Military Intelligence Mark Ivanir played a role in; "Operation: Joshua" (1985) which airlifted Ethiopian Jews from Sudan to Israel. That touches on the border area between Ethiopia and Sudan being The Birthplace of Humanity, the place where the Human Race first emerged. It also touches on how when Moses led Jews from Egypt to Israel in The Exodus some Jews ended up going to Ethiopia instead, leading to the similarities between Judaism and the Ethiopian Orthodox Christian Church. The only Christian Church which recognises the apocalyptic Book of Enoch from the Jewish Bible.

In his song in Emilia Pérez; "Lady" Mark Ivanir likens Dr Wasserman's work to a war. Singing that in all his years of performing gender-confirmation treatment he's never been able to end the conflict, the war, between a Transgender person's two genders. However with Mark Ivanir being an Israeli who served in the IDF that can also be used to discuss Israel's long history of war and conflict with its Arab neighbours. 

With Mark Ivanir having participated in (non-combat) IDF operations in Sudan that touches on the long history of Israel's conflicts being compared to Sudan's wars, going back to the Second Palestinian Intifada (2000-2005). The damaging effect that whataboutism has had on both countries, particularly Sudan which had a Two State Solution imposed on it, creating the nation of South Sudan. The current outrage at Israel over the war Hamas imposed upon it compared to the total lack of concern about the much longer, much more vicious war currently going on in Sudan. With Homeland being a show all about returning hostages and being a remake of an Israeli TV show about returning hostages Mark Ivanir's role in it goes to the heart of the war Hamas has imposed on Israel; The October 7th Genocide (2023-Present). The taking of 251 hostages, prima facie, a Crime Against Humanity contrary to Article 7.1(e)(i)(k) of The Rome Statute of 1998.

Mark Ivanir's time on Homeland overlapped with Costa Ronin. A Russia speaking Russian-Australian actor who played Oleg Igorevich Burov in; "The Americans" (2013-2018). Following the 2022 intensification of The Ukraine War (2014-Present) Costa Ronin seems to have joined the rest of the Russian speaking Russian-American cast of The Americans and Anora (2024) in becoming a marginalised community within America. One which people seem to think it's time to welcome back into the mainstream.

As you may have guessed from the key scenes taking the form of songs Emilia Pérez sees itself as an Opera. Particularly Classical European Opera is seen as very elitist high art and culture. A good way of letting people know how much more intelligent you are than them. However the plots of many Classical European Operas are utterly ridiculous. Far more ridiculous than the Telenovelas that Karla Sofía Gasćon is famous for could ever get away with. It's certainly no coincidence that in much of the English speaking world that Telenovelas are known as; "Soap Operas." Daytime TV shows with outrageously silly plots aimed at 1950's housewives and sponsored by the makers of household soaps and cleaning supplies.

What elevates Operas to high art and culture is not the stories but the way that the music is used to tell the story. It's used to convey the emotion of the story, allowing the audience to feel what the characters are feeling. A very well known piece of Classical European Opera comes from Gioachino Rossini's; "William Tell." It's often wrongly called; "The William Tell Overture" although the overture is a combination of little snippets of all the music in the Opera. The piece is actually called; "March of the Swiss Soldiers" which depicts soldiers, on Horseback, rushing to battle. Played live by a large orchestra in a concert hall with properly designed acoustics it really helps you feel as though you are galloping into battle on a Horse. Particularly if you are experienced at Horse riding, as a 19th Century audience would have been.

When the first movies were made the technology didn't exist to include a soundtrack. They were all Silent Movies. However movie makers were able to show their Silent Movies in theatres accompanied by a live orchestra. Making the storytelling of many Silent Movies similar to Operas. The first US movie to do this was; "The Birth of a Nation" (1915) about the Ku Klux Klan. It included Richard Wagner's "Ride of the Valkyries" to show the Manifest Destiny of White Americans to lead the World. Within Germanic Paganism a Valkyrie is sort of like an angel which carries the souls of dead warriors from the battlefield to, essentially, Heaven. So the music very much invokes the peril of coming battle and death.

Now the technology exists to include soundtracks many filmmakers still borrow from Opera. Rossini's March of the Swiss Soldiers is famous for being used as the opening theme to the US TV show; "The Lone Ranger" (1949-1957) and the 1956, 1958 and 2013 movies. Operatic pieces will frequently be used in TV shows and movies, normally to convey that the villain is doing something particularly villainous. 

By far one of the most ridiculous plots to any Classical European Opera has got to belong to Giacomo Puccini's; "Tosca" which was very much inspired by Richard Wagner's work. One scene includes a dawn execution. In Italy at the time the Opera is set dawn would be signalled by the ringing of Church bells. So the music in the scene uses bells, in order to make you feel as though you are in Italy at dawn. It's recognised as one of the first uses of theatrical sound-effects.

No doubt there has been debate over whether Emilia Pérez can be considered an Opera, rather than just a Musical. There has long been debate over whether it is possible to make an Opera movie. Even the best cinema surround sound systems can't compete with the all consuming, visceral experience of a full live orchestra performing in a properly acoustically designed concert hall. It's the difference between going to the Coachella music festival and streaming the Coachella music festival on YouTube. It turns out that without the visceral experience live versions of songs are just worse versions of songs.

When people go to see Classical European Operas, some of which are now hundreds of years old, no-one is going expecting a surprise plot twist. Instead they're going to see how the performance of the Opera is staged. So as a form of storytelling Opera is very big and very animated. Tosca doesn't mourn the death of her lover with a silent tear and a faraway expression. She wails her heart out, at the top of her vocal range for 10 minutes. Despite its elitist reputation Opera really isn't that much more sophisticated than WWE Wrestling.

Another very big, very animated form of storytelling is Japanese Kabuki Theatre. You probably think of going to the theatre as being much like going to a movie. You sit in silence in a darkened room for several hours while actors perform in front of you, behind an imaginary fourth wall. 

Kabuki Theatre is completely different from that. The stage is set up in a town square and the audience crowds around it or watches from businesses surrounding the square. Kabuki stages often include a; "Hanamichi" or; "Flower Path" stage which stretches through the crowd allowing characters to make dramatic entrances. A lot of what you will recognise from big arena concerts by popstars; surprise entrances, stages stretching through the crowd, trapdoors, lifts and people being raised on wires are all things borrowed from Kabuki Theatre. Another huge element of Kabuki Theatre is; "Keren" or; "Playing to the Crowd." So when a villain or hero enters they will turn and make big gestures to the crowd who will all boo or cheer. Completely removing the fourth wall and making the crowd part of the performance. The ultimate visceral experience.

Kabuki Theatre performances traditionally begin at Sunrise and end at Sunset. It is common that a Kabuki Theatre performance will include a main play along with a series of short, hour long, plays. These serve as intermissions in the main play in order to give the actors in the main play a chance to eat, rest and do other things. Kabuki Theatre is often mistaken for Bunraku shadow puppet performances. That's because Bunraku is used in intermissions in the main play in Kabuki Theatre productions.

It is probably going too far to say that Kabuki Theatre was invented as a front for prostitution. However Kabuki Theatre is deeply intertwined with prostitution. If you liked one of the actors you saw performing on stage then during the course of the day long performance you could pay to have sex with them, during the Bunraku and other intermissions. A big theme of The Oscars 2025 has been actors as sex workers. The Japanese term; "Yujo" can be used interchangeably to mean; "Actress" or; "Common Prostitute." Japanese culture is rather famous for Geisha's who are often mistaken for prostitutes. They're really high status companions who perform social rituals rather than sexual services. Referring to someone as; "Yujo" was quite the insult.

Kabuki Theatre was originally performed by all Female casts; "Onna-kabuki." Due to the intertwining with prostitution that was banned. Given rise to; "Wakashu-kabuki" in which Female roles were played by young boys. Due to the intertwining with prostitution that was banned. That gave rise to; "Yaro-kabuki" in which all roles were played by men. Although that still didn't stop the rampant prostitution the Japanese authorities had really given up on trying to ban it by that point.

As such the history of Kabuki Theatre is part of that long storytelling tradition of Males taking on Female roles and vice-versa. A theatrical tradition of Cross-Dressing which includes Drag Acts.

Japan's main Animist belief system is; "Shinto" which translates as either; "Way of the Gods" or; "Way of the Holy Forces." There are over 300 hundred categories of these gods/forces or; "Kami." However amongst the most important are the five; "Kotomatukami" or; "Distinguished Heavenly Kami" and the; "Kamiyo-nanyo" or; "Seven Generations of the Age of Gods." The Kotomatukami and the first two generations of Kamiyo-nanyo are considered; "Hitroigami" or; "Those who exist alone." They are both Male and Female. You could describe them as; "Transgender." Male genitals; "Otongi" and Female genitals; "Otonobi" didn't emerge until the fifth generation of Kamiyo-nanyo. 

So the contrast between the Hitroigami Kami within Japanese Shinto and the Cross-Dressing of Wakashu-kabuki and Yaro-kabuki is a useful way to highlight and discuss the differences between Transgenderism and Cross-Dressing.

It was used, rather impressively, for just that purpose at the Opening Ceremony of the delayed 2020 Summer Olympics held in Tokyo, Japan. The one just before The Great American Bell Ringing of 2021. The one where we learned that, apparently, I know absolutely nothing about Horses(!)




Another movie to follow in Part 7.

18:10 on 24/4/25 (UK date).